Coding Ahead
CasePilot
Medical Coding Assistant
Case2Code
Search and Code Lookup Tool
RedactPHI
HIPAA-Compliant PHI Redaction
DetectICD10CM
ICD-10-CM Code Detection
Log in Register free account
1 code page views remaining. Guest accounts are limited to 1 page view. Register free account to get 5 more views.
Log in Register free account

Official Description

Interrogation device evaluation (in person) with analysis, review and report by a physician or other qualified health care professional, includes connection, recording and disconnection per patient encounter; wearable defibrillator system

© Copyright 2025 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.

Common Language Description

The CPT® Code 93292 refers to an in-person interrogation device evaluation specifically for a wearable defibrillator system. This procedure involves a comprehensive assessment conducted by a physician or another qualified healthcare professional. The evaluation includes several critical components: the connection of the patient to the device, the recording of data, and the disconnection of the device after the assessment is complete. The primary purpose of this evaluation is to determine the functionality of the wearable defibrillator, especially when a patient exhibits symptoms that may indicate device malfunction or alterations in cardiac function. During the evaluation, the healthcare professional establishes a connection between the wearable defibrillator and an interrogation device, allowing for the interrogation of the defibrillator's data. This process includes a thorough review of the electrocardiogram (ECG) recordings to identify any arrhythmias and to assess the overall performance of the defibrillator, including its sensing capabilities and battery status. The findings from this evaluation are documented in a written report, which is provided to the patient, ensuring they are informed about their device's performance and any necessary follow-up actions. This code is billed on a per encounter basis, reflecting the individualized nature of the evaluation process.

© Copyright 2025 Coding Ahead. All rights reserved.

1. Indications

The in-person interrogation device evaluation using CPT® Code 93292 is indicated for patients who present with symptoms or complaints that may suggest a malfunction of the wearable defibrillator system or a change in their cardiac function. This evaluation is crucial for monitoring patients who rely on wearable defibrillators for managing their cardiac health, particularly in situations where there are concerns about the device's performance or the patient's arrhythmic events.

  • Device Malfunction Symptoms indicating potential issues with the wearable defibrillator, necessitating an evaluation to ensure proper function.
  • Change in Cardiac Function Any alterations in the patient's cardiac status that may require assessment of the defibrillator's effectiveness and settings.

2. Procedure

The procedure for CPT® Code 93292 involves several key steps that ensure a thorough evaluation of the wearable defibrillator system. Each step is critical for obtaining accurate data and assessing the device's functionality.

  • Step 1: Patient Connection The first step involves connecting the patient to the electrocardiogram (ECG) monitor. This connection is essential for real-time monitoring of the patient's cardiac activity during the evaluation.
  • Step 2: Device Connection Following the ECG connection, the wearable defibrillator system is linked to the interrogation device. This step allows for the retrieval of stored data from the defibrillator, which is crucial for the subsequent analysis.
  • Step 3: Data Interrogation The defibrillator is interrogated to assess its performance. This includes reviewing the stored data for any arrhythmias, ectopic beats, and mode switch episodes, as well as evaluating the number and duration of these events.
  • Step 4: Review of Physiological Data The healthcare professional reviews exercise and physiological stress data, noting heart rate adaptations that may indicate how well the defibrillator is responding to the patient's cardiac needs.
  • Step 5: Evaluation of Defibrillator Function The defibrillator's sensing capabilities and capture of cardiac rhythm are assessed. This evaluation includes checking the leads and battery status to ensure the device is functioning optimally.
  • Step 6: Review of Alerts Any alerts generated by the defibrillator during the monitoring period are reviewed to identify potential issues that may require further attention.
  • Step 7: Reporting Findings After completing the evaluation, the healthcare professional informs the patient of the findings and provides a written report detailing the assessment results and any recommendations for follow-up care.

3. Post-Procedure

Post-procedure care following the interrogation device evaluation involves informing the patient about the findings from the assessment. The healthcare professional will discuss any necessary adjustments to the defibrillator settings or further monitoring that may be required based on the evaluation results. The patient may also receive instructions on how to manage their device and recognize any symptoms that warrant immediate medical attention. Continuous follow-up may be necessary to ensure the defibrillator remains effective in managing the patient's cardiac condition.

Short Descr WCD DEVICE INTERROGATE
Medium Descr INTERROGATION EVAL IN PERSON WR DEFIBRILLATOR
Long Descr Interrogation device evaluation (in person) with analysis, review and report by a physician or other qualified health care professional, includes connection, recording and disconnection per patient encounter; wearable defibrillator system
Status Code Active Code
Global Days XXX - Global Concept Does Not Apply
PC/TC Indicator (26, TC) 1 - Diagnostic Tests for Radiology Services
Multiple Procedures (51) 6 - Special payment adjustment rules on the technical component (TC) of multiple diagnostic cardiovascular services apply...
Bilateral Surgery (50) 0 - 150% payment adjustment for bilateral procedures does NOT apply.
Physician Supervisions 09 - Concept does not apply.
Assistant Surgeon (80, 82) 0 - Payment restriction for assistants at surgery applies to this procedure...
Co-Surgeons (62) 0 - Co-surgeons not permitted for this procedure.
Team Surgery (66) 0 - Team surgeons not permitted for this procedure.
Diagnostic Imaging Family 99 - Concept Does Not Apply
APC Status Indicator STV-Packaged Codes
Type of Service (TOS) 1 - Medical Care
Berenson-Eggers TOS (BETOS) T2D - Other tests - other
MUE 1
CCS Clinical Classification 203 - Electrographic cardiac monitoring
26 Professional component: certain procedures are a combination of a physician or other qualified health care professional component and a technical component. when the physician or other qualified health care professional component is reported separately, the service may be identified by adding modifier 26 to the usual procedure number.
51 Multiple procedures: when multiple procedures, other than e/m services, physical medicine and rehabilitation services or provision of supplies (eg, vaccines), are performed at the same session by the same individual, the primary procedure or service may be reported as listed. the additional procedure(s) or service(s) may be identified by appending modifier 51 to the additional procedure or service code(s). note: this modifier should not be appended to designated "add-on" codes (see appendix d).
59 Distinct procedural service: under certain circumstances, it may be necessary to indicate that a procedure or service was distinct or independent from other non-e/m services performed on the same day. modifier 59 is used to identify procedures/services, other than e/m services, that are not normally reported together, but are appropriate under the circumstances. documentation must support a different session, different procedure or surgery, different site or organ system, separate incision/excision, separate lesion, or separate injury (or area of injury in extensive injuries) not ordinarily encountered or performed on the same day by the same individual. however, when another already established modifier is appropriate it should be used rather than modifier 59. only if no more descriptive modifier is available, and the use of modifier 59 best explains the circumstances, should modifier 59 be used. note: modifier 59 should not be appended to an e/m service. to report a separate and distinct e/m service with a non-e/m service performed on the same date, see modifier 25.
AQ Physician providing a service in an unlisted health professional shortage area (hpsa)
GC This service has been performed in part by a resident under the direction of a teaching physician
GV Attending physician not employed or paid under arrangement by the patient's hospice provider
GW Service not related to the hospice patient's terminal condition
GZ Item or service expected to be denied as not reasonable and necessary
TC Technical component; under certain circumstances, a charge may be made for the technical component alone; under those circumstances the technical component charge is identified by adding modifier 'tc' to the usual procedure number; technical component charges are institutional charges and not billed separately by physicians; however, portable x-ray suppliers only bill for technical component and should utilize modifier tc; the charge data from portable x-ray suppliers will then be used to build customary and prevailing profiles
XS Separate structure, a service that is distinct because it was performed on a separate organ/structure
XU Unusual non-overlapping service, the use of a service that is distinct because it does not overlap usual components of the main service
Date
Action
Notes
2013-01-01 Changed Description Changed
2009-01-01 Added -
Code
Description
Code
Description
Code
Description
Code
Description
Code
Description
CasePilot

Get instant expert-level medical coding assistance.

Ask about:
CPT Codes Guidelines Modifiers Crosswalks NCCI Edits Compliance Medicare Coverage
Example: "What is CPT code 99213?" or "Guidelines for E/M services"